Currency control
May 21, 2026

Challenging a fine for a currency-control violation under Art. 15.25 of the Administrative Offences Code

Print
In brief

Defending an individual entrepreneur held liable under Part 4, Art. 15.25 of the Administrative Offences Code.

Background

The Moscow tax authority issued an order for an alleged violation in performing a cross-border loan agreement with a foreign company.  The order was sent well after the deadline, depriving the client of the right to file a timely complaint.

Opposing position

The tax authority proceeded from a presumption that an administrative offense had been committed, insisting the client's liability was unconditionally lawful and that the maximum fine should apply.

Our position and key arguments

We carried out a detailed review of the case file and the terms of the cross-border loan, on the basis of which we filed a reasoned complaint and a motion to restore the deadline with the district court.  Particular attention was given to the application for interim measures to prevent immediate enforcement of the fine.

Outcome

The complaint and motions have been accepted by the court; a ruling on reducing the penalty is pending.

Why it matters

The project's value lies in preventing substantial financial loss for the client by applying mechanisms to reduce the administrative fine to 5% of the amount of the unlawful currency transaction, preserving the client's capital.

Applies to

Challenging fines for currency-legislation violations (Art. 15.25 of the Administrative Offences Code); restoring missed procedural deadlines; applying interim measures in administrative cases.

Published: May 21, 2026 · Updated: May 21, 2026
's services include
Assessing the prospects of challenging an order

under Art. 15.25 of the Administrative Offences Code

Preparing objections to the case file

ron liability for currency-related violations

Challenging rulings under art. 15.25 of the Administrative Code

for violations of currency legislation

Handling disputes with an authorized bank

over its refusal to process a transaction

Advising on and defending notification and reporting (RMF) obligations

over its refusal to process a transaction

Let us discuss your situation
Tell us about the circumstances of the dispute — we will suggest a strategy and assess the prospects before the work begins.
Schedule a consultation